Scroll-driven storytelling
The page reveals itself as the visitor moves. Sections pin, content scrubs frame-by-frame against scroll position, chapters hand off to each other. It turns a landing page into a narrative instead of a stack of blocks.
Every animation on this page is hand-written code in a single file. No page builder, no theme, no plugins, nothing loaded from anywhere else. Scroll — the page is the whole pitch.
Elementor is the right call for most of the work you do. Fast, familiar, and the client can edit it. I'm not here to replace it. I'm here for the other twenty percent — the pitch where the brand deserves motion, where the builder hits its ceiling, and where you end up talking a great idea down to fit the tool. That work, designed and built properly, under your name.
The page reveals itself as the visitor moves. Sections pin, content scrubs frame-by-frame against scroll position, chapters hand off to each other. It turns a landing page into a narrative instead of a stack of blocks.
Real-time graphics running on the GPU — liquid distortion on imagery, generative backgrounds, particle fields, 3D product views a visitor can spin. This is the layer that makes a site look expensive.
Elements with weight. Drag with momentum, springs that overshoot and settle, cursor-reactive magnetism. It's the difference between a site that animates and a site that feels like a product.
Headlines that mask in line by line, characters that stagger and scramble, type that fills with colour as it's read. Typography carries most of a brand's personality — it deserves more than a fade-in.
No white flash between pages. Content morphs, imagery carries across, the URL changes underneath. The site stops feeling like a set of documents and starts feeling like an app.
The reason builders cap out isn't imagination, it's budget — every effect costs kilobytes and main-thread time. Written by hand, the effects are cheap and the page still loads in under a second on 4G.
Two thousand points, rebuilt every frame. Nothing is on a timer — your position on the page drives every coordinate, colour and rotation directly.
Because the animation is a function of scroll, not a sequence that fires once. Visitors stay in control, which is why it never feels gimmicky.
The same element carries the whole section instead of six stacked blocks. Fewer assets, less scrolling, more attention on the thing you're actually selling.
It's the technique behind almost every flagship product page you've admired — and it is completely out of reach in a page builder.
Representative figures from real audits of plugin-heavy WordPress builds — illustrative, not a guarantee.
Send me any live URL. I'll audit it and send back a performance report as a white-labelled PDF you can put your own logo on and forward to the client. Free, no strings, and it usually starts a conversation about a rebuild on its own.
Sites you admire, the client's vision, and the deadline. Nothing needs designing on your side — that's my half of the job. Put me on the client call if it's easier.
You see direction before a line of code exists. One number, one date, in writing. No hourly creep, no surprise change orders landing on your margin.
Updated daily. You and your client comment on it like a Figma file. Nothing gets revealed at the end as a surprise.
Code, docs, CMS access and deploy pipeline handed to you. You bill your rate. I'm a line item on your side of the ledger, nowhere on theirs.
They still can. I ship with a proper headless CMS — Sanity, Payload or Storyblok — where the editing screen is a clean form: headline, body, image, publish. Cleaner than Elementor, and there's no way for a client to drag the layout apart at 11pm and call you about it. You hold the admin, branded as yours.
A marketing site is three to five weeks from final design. That's the same ballpark as a heavy builder project once you count plugin wrangling, cross-browser QA and the week you lose when two plugins start fighting. The difference is you get a date up front and I hit it.
It isn't for every client, and I'd rather say that plainly. It's for the ones you're already quoting at the top of your range, the rebrands where the site has to carry the new positioning, and the pitches you lost because the work looked like everyone else's. Custom is what lets you quote higher and actually defend the number in the room.
Largely nobody, which is the point. It deploys as static files to a CDN — no PHP version to keep current, no plugin updates, no vulnerable login page to brute-force. No 3am "we've been hacked" call. If you want me on standby for changes, there's a light monthly retainer; most clients don't need one.
Fair question, and you should ask it of any partner. You get the repository, commented code, a written handover doc, and a standard framework any competent front-end dev can pick up on day one. No proprietary anything. No lock-in to me — which is also the best reason to believe I'll be worth keeping.
No. Design is half of what I do. Send references, the brands your client admires, and a sense of the vision — I'll design it and build it, and you'll see the direction before any code is written. Nobody on your side needs to draw anything. If you'd rather hand me a finished Figma, that works too, and I'll build it exactly as drawn instead of talking it down to fit a tool.
Motion for its own sake is a liability — it slows the page and gets in the way. Used properly it does three jobs: directs attention to the next thing, explains something a static image can't, and signals that the brand is serious. Everything on this page respects reduced-motion settings, works on keyboard, and degrades to a fast static page if scripts fail. I'll happily cut an effect if it can't earn its kilobytes.
Or just send me a live client site and I'll audit it and send back the real performance numbers. Costs you nothing and you keep the report.